Read Pdf Version here
Question: 1What would you say to someone who doesn’t believe in hadith? .
Response:For starters, the Qur’an is the word of Allah. And it instructs believers not to convey any report coming from one who is a blatant shameless sinner (fasiq) until we have ascertained the facts about the report. Allah, The Most High, says, “O you who believe! When a blatant sinner (fasiq) comes to you with news, ascertain clarity, so that you don’t afflict a people (wrongfully) out of ignorance, and thereafter become regretful for what you have done.” By contrast, we can understand from this verse that we are not obliged to verify the report through additional transmitters if the one giving the report is known to be sincere, upright, and truthful, since Allah made specific mention of the blatant sinner, fasiq. In other words, if He had intended for us to verify the truthfulness of all people regardless of their level of integrity, he would have said, “…when a person comes to you…” But He said, “…when a blatant sinner comes to you…” In addition, discarding the hadith altogether would lead to impracticality in the Qur’an. What I mean is that we would not be able to properly fulfill certain essential and important commandments found in the Qur’an. For example, we’d not know how to make Salat, since the Qur’an doesn’t explain in spite of ordering us to do so. We wouldn’t know how to pay Zakat. We wouldn’t know what type of wealth Zakat is due on. We wouldn’t know how much is to be given in Zakat, etc. But the Qur’an enjoys this upon us . We wouldn’t know how to properly perform the Hajj pilgrimage even though the Qur’an does gives some basic rules that are to be followed . We wouldn’t know what would constitute stealing , and what part of the hand or arm would have to be cut, since the word translated as ‘hand’ has a number of different connotations. It sometimes means from the tips of the fingers to the joint of the wrist. It sometimes means the entire arm extending all the way up to the shoulder joint. We would also not know what constitutes a proper Islamic slaughter . I mean, we wouldn’t know how the animal has to be killed, where it has to be cut, when Allah’s name needs to be mentioned over it, and a number of other things. We would also not know the abrogating and abrogated verses of the Qur’an without aid of the hadith literature, even though the Qur’an confirms the concept of abrogation . For instance, one verse orders the believers to bequeath a portion of their wealth to their parents , while another verse grants them an automatic portion of the inheritance . To leave this without the aid of the hadith literature would imply a lack of wisdom on the part of the Creator, since it would seem unreasonable and unnecessary for one to include their parents in their wills, when they have already been given a definite share. We would then not be able to know if the verse that entitles parents to inheritance was revealed first or if it was the one that orders us to include them in our wills . Another example is the verse where Allah states that women guilty of lewdness are to be detained in their homes until death comes to them , while in another verse he states that the person guilty of the same thing whether man or woman is to be flogged 100 stripes . To leave this without taking recourse to the hadith literature would demand that we accept that there is contradiction in the Qur’an. These are just a few matters that require explication from the hadith literature. So, if one was to discard the hadith altogether, it would be impossible to implement much of the Islamic Law. Sometimes people who reject the hadith do so premised on the argument that the Qur’an is indisputably authentic (mutawatir), while most hadiths are not (ahadiyyah). That is, we don’t have 100% confidence in the authenticity and credibility of the hadith reports, while we do have 100% certainty that the Qur’an as it is has been transmitted to us without being altered. True indeed! But we must still make a distinction between the hadiths that are not indisputably authentic but give us near certainty that they are authentic (sahih ahadi/hasan ahadi), and those hadiths that give us more reason to believe that they are not true (da’if). The truth is that Allah has not made it an obligation on us prior to carrying out an injunction that we ascertain that the source of that injunction be established through an indisputably authentic source. Rather, there are quite a number of injunctions established by the Qur’an itself that we are obliged to carry out even though the path through which we establish that reality under question does not lead us to 100% certainty. Examples of those are:
- the injunction about taking two male witnesses in business transactions and in the absence of one male, then two females .
- A second example is the injunction about taking on 4 witnesses to establish that illicit intercourse (zina) has been committed . Also in the same category is the injunction that calls for a man and his wife to swear 5 times in public to remove the accusation by the husband that his wife committed adultery, and to remove from him any obligation for any children born from her after his accusation .