Takfir and “The Study Qur’an”

Please Share on Your Social Media

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

In a scathing  review of the controversial  new work “The Study Qur’an”, Shaykh Gibril Fouad Haddad says the following:

“The translation of muslimūn mostly as “submitters” (3:52, 3:64, 3:80, 11:14…) is justifiable, the latter construing the original as a nominal form, were it not for the editors’ underlying Perennialist bias which strives to separate the historical acception of islām as “the religion revealed through the Prophet of Islam” from generic “submission to God in general.” Hence the claim that “in the Quran Abraham and Jesus are also called muslim in the sense of ‘submitter’” (p. xxix, my emphasis). In reality the religion of Islam is submission sine qua non and all prophets are called Muslim with a capital from the start—and in the sense of timeless, essential Muḥammadans, followers of the Prophet Muḥammad as explicited in verse 3:81—just as all Muslims are also submitters. In addition, submission is always understood as submission to the latest prophet of the time, not to an earlier one, and so no submission remains today except that manifested in Islam. Al-Ghazālī cited in the book of naskh of his Mustaṣfā “the consensus in the agreement of the entire Community that the sacred law of Muḥammad—upon him blessings and peace—has abrogated the laws of his predecessors” while al-Nawawī in the book of ridda of his Rawḍat al-ṭālibīn stipulated, “Someone who does not believe that whoever follows another religion than Islam is an unbeliever, like the Christians, or has doubts about declaring them to be unbelievers, or considers their way to be correct, is himself a kāfir even if with that he professes Islam and believes in it.”

See Shaykh Gibril Haddad’s full critique HERE

The above passage raised considerable objections and initiated a claim that Shaykh Haddad  has engaged in ‘takfir’ (declaring someone a ‘disbeliever) against the authors of the Study Qur’an. This leads us to two questions:

  • Does the specific quotation of Imam Nawawi in  the  above passage constitute a declaration of ‘takfir’ against the authors of the Study Qur’an?
  • What exactly is takfir?

To answer these two questions, we turned to Shaykh Abdullah bin Hamid Ali the Founding Director of the Lamppost Education Initiative and the Director of the Islamic Law program at Zaytuna College. See the video below

 

 

Dr. Abdullah bin Hamid Ali

Dr. Abdullah bin Hamid Ali

holds a Ph.D. in Cultural and Historical Studies in Religion (2016) and an M.A. in Ethics and Social Theory (2012) from the Graduate Theological Union. He obtained his B.A. (ijaza ‘ulya) in Islamic Law (Shariah) from the prestigious Al-Qarawiyin University of Fes, Morocco in 2001. He served as full time Islamic chaplain at the State Correctional Institute of Chester, PA from 2002-2007, and is the founding director of the Lamppost Education Initiative. His research interests include the interconnection between law and identity formation, comparative Islamic law, and Islam’s role in the modern world.

Support The Lamppost Education Initiative

In order to continue the services in Islamic education and research that the Lamppost Education Initiative has provided for more than 15 years, we need your donations and support. Find out more by clicking the link below:

More Posts

Get The Latest Updates Sign Up For Our Newsletter

stay informed!

Sign up for our email list to receive exclusive content and notifications. Subscribe now and we will send you a special gift.

Subscribe to our email list and Get Your Free download of Dr. Abdullah bin Hamid Ali's acclaimed essay: "Scholarly Consensus: I'jma Between Use and Misuse"